
Why watch The Exorcist III
George C. Scott—gravelly, haunted, operating at full intensity—anchors this film as a detective consumed by a mystery that shouldn't exist. Fifteen years after the original exorcism, mutilated bodies start appearing, and Scott's Lieutenant Kinderman becomes convinced the evil never actually left. It's the kind of slow-burn obsession that echoes prestige crime dramas, except the crime scene photos are genuinely unholy.
Director William Peter Blatty (who wrote the original) strips away the bombast and trades jump scares for dread. The pacing is methodical, almost procedural, building an atmosphere thick enough to choke on—think Mindhunter filtered through supernatural noir. Brad Dourif's supporting turn is absolutely unhinged, and the film trusts its audience to sit with discomfort rather than spoon-feed answers.
This is for anyone who finds slow-burn horror more terrifying than spectacle, who remembers when exorcism films meant psychological warfare rather than CGI convulsions. The final act pivots in ways you won't see coming, and the film's meditation on faith, doubt, and institutional evil still stings.
You'll be thinking about the possessed patient scenes—particularly one involving a hospital hallway—long after the credits roll.
— The What2Watch desk · US
Where to watch
The story
On the fifteenth anniversary of the exorcism that claimed Father Damien Karras' life, Police Lieutenant Kinderman's world is once again shattered when a boy is found decapitated and savagely crucified.
If you liked this
Reviews & ratings
Very good sequel retains the high standard Blatty's original screenplay set! In going through the original 'Exorcist' trilogy (I have the DVD 6-pack, with the two versions of the remarkable original, as well as the two recent prequels, so far unwatched), I was intrigued of seeing Oscar-winning writer William Peter Blatty's second stint behind the camera (for the record, I adored his 'The Ninth Configuration', done…Show more
What's good in this film we can attribute to William Peter Blatty's script and direction and to the casting, especially Brad Dourif and George C. Scott; what's bad, to Executive Meddling – in particular the last minute exorcism performed by a last minute priest; it says a lot that Burton's Father Lamont from Exorcist II: The Heretic is more memorable than Nicol Williamson's Father Morning. Unlike The Heretic, III…Show more

This was the best sequel to The Exorcist they made, and that isn't really saying much. The second one was horrible and the ones that followed were horrible. In fact, I think they were so bad it was instantly remade. But, this one was decent, it felt the most like an actual sequel to the Exorcist, it was unsettling, it was intelligent, it was pretty memorable in its own way. But it still was a bit too much, not und…Show more
By the numbers
Top cast


















































